Handling Mercantile Admiralty/Maritime Courts
Two Very Different Ways To Handle The Courts
Court Cheat Sheet - Collapse the CQV
This Affidavit is all one needs in court, and nothing more needs to be said on the matter so long as they say those words below on the court of record. No more fighting for your rights in their BS Courts.
All your members have to say is the following when ever asked to answer their questions...
When the judge try's to joinder you to strawman name – By asking "Will the name JOE DOE, please appear before/address the court"
Then ask... “Are you saying that the trust which you are now administrating is the FNAME MNAME SNAME Trust?
-----------------------------------------
Judge/Trustee will ask again - “FNAME SNAME is indeed, in the court!”
Point to the Trustee, “YOU are FNAME SNAME today, aren't you?”
Frustrated Judge and Prosecution - “Before we go any further, I need to know who YOU are”
Address the Court Clerk – the trustee for the CQV trust owned by the state - “Are you the CQV’s Trustee who has appointed this Judge/Magistrate as administrator and trustee of the constructive trust case #1234567?
“Did you also appoint the prosecutor as the executor of this constructive trust?”
Then point to the Judge/Admin/Trustee – “So, does that not make you the Trustee?”
Then point to the prosecutor – “Thereby making you the executor?”
The Living Man who has WILLINGLY decided to go to court now states - "On the record - That I am the beneficiary, so, now we know who’s who and, as beneficiary, I authorize you to handle the accounting and dissolve this constructive trust. I now claim my body so I am collapsing the CQV trust which you have charged, as there is no value in it. You have committed fraud against all laws!”
Most likely not finish before you hear - “Case Dismissed – We withdraw the charges”
If things go awry you can revert back to a failsafe response to ANY & ALL questions
All you need to say if you stuff up
Everything a judge says is an offer – “I do not Consent, I do not accept your offer”
Be the hero for all mankind
If a Judge/Trustee dissolves the first CQV Trust, they Dissolve them all
– the FRAUD ENDS -
__________________________________________________________________________
Another Tactic For Appearing before The (Fraudulent Mercantile) Courts
Similar Names:
When the Judge directs you to the podium - say... Under Duress for the court of record.
My name is Fname Mname, i am not the person summoned here today though we have similar names.
Then say... "I am only here to identify who will indemnify me should I be harmed or damaged in this court."
If judge pushes the point of confirming your name - My Affidavit of Fact entered, recorded and filed into this court regarding this matter, speaks my truth, tells the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
My Affidavit of Fact entered, recorded and filed into this court regarding this matter, speaks my truth, tells the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.
All you need to say if you stuff up
Everything a judge says is an offer – “I do not Consent, I do not accept your offer”
Repeat every time they ask you something. be polite, keep in mind after the court you will be invoicing everyone of them so collect names of the following:
Court Clerk
Prosecutor
Judge
Arresting Officer (if you haven't already billed him)
False Witnesses (who miss identify you as the fiction)
___________________________________________________________________________
Am I Dead in Court?
Call the Court Bailiff as your witness to the stand – any will do.
Why?
With the primary purpose of the state being to protect the lives & property of its inhabitants, all law enforcers and particularly those, Sheriffs, and court bailiffs, being State GovCorp officers, their duty is to protect the lives and properties of every living being entering these Administrative / Admiralty / Tribunal Courts, against any & all officers of the court, as these officers are bearing false witness that the “DEFENDANTS” are deceased, when in fact, the Bailiff can witness, first hand, that the “DEFENDANT” is alive and well!
A Bailiff, then, can be asked to testify to this fact, as he is always under oath to tell the Truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth!
REF: Scott v McNeal 154 U.S. 34 (1894) Reveals what is going on in their court system.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/154/34/case.html
NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Ben Cheating in his Private Capacity
Regarding: Your Court Attendance Notice; H 89043210, CNI Number 818546739, dated for DOWNING CENTRE LOCAL Court on Friday 7th October, 2022 at 9.30 am..
I am writing on behalf of the accused person Mr FNAME MNAME SNAME. It appears, Senior
Constable Ben Cheating and the other parties are attempting to misrepresent a Wo/Man, fname-mname, as the person Mr FIRST MIDDLE SURNAME in order to pillage my property. As I am a Natural Wo/Man, I am only obligated to obey the Laws of God, Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900UK & 1901, Crimes Act 1914, Common Law and Rule of Law having Royal Assent / Proclamation Certificate. I reserve my Inalienable and Unalienable Rights, which all employees of the Incorporated Government and its Departments will honour, respect, protect and NOT ABUSE my rights as a living, free Wo/Man, made of flesh and blood.
As outlined in my numerous other notices to the parties, I DO NOT CONSENT to act as Surety for the Incorporated Queensland Government including all its departments, who Fraudulently created the SURNAME CESTUI QUE VIE (CQV) TRUST / PERSON from the Birth Certificate my mother was coerced to sign without full disclosure.
You have been ill-informed that fname-mname, a Wo/Man born of flesh and blood with the similar identity, is one and the same known as the “person” in all its Capital variations.
Immediately correct your Brief of Evidence Case File, Records, Reports, Court Summons, Infringement / Criminal Claim, including in all other associated State Government Departments, corporate associates, agents, contractors, immediately correct the records, to ensure your Indictable Offences against the Commonwealth will be avoided i.e. Identity theft, Murder of the living to joinder to fiction person, Fraud, Barratry, Personage, Trespass, Personating a Commonwealth Officer, Aids & Abets, Pervert the course of Justice etc to name a few, or have Indictable Offences made against you in your private capacity under the Crimes Act 1914.
By correcting all Incorporated Government Records to make all that is criminally entered, will make right, true and accurate fact. If nothing is done to correct, Ben Cheating and all State Government Employees associated with this fraud will be held criminally accountable, complicit in this fraud because of their personal Misconduct action.
Should you Ben Cheating proceed with the crime of Personation for Administering in a Court not Constitutionally approved as described in CHAPTER III: The Judicature.
Refer to; Crimes Act 1914 and Criminal Code 1899 s (TBA 514 or 510), for using the NOM-DE-GURRE, presenting the fictitious entity of my sname name in which I have not consented too in writing or by means of implied; tacit or informed consent;
further more no contract showing full Duty of disclosure was brought forward to disclosure the using of the NOM-DE-GUERRE or the Strawman with out my consent or with me agreeing in writing or verbally;
further more fraud removes the error in the name being rectified by the body appearing for fraud can not be derived from fraud:
Pursuant to section 3Z of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth), I, fname-mname will place you under Arrest [Arrest Powers with out warrant by persons] [by the people] Ben Cheating and the Magistrate / Judge sitting as Sole Bias Arbitrator (non De Jure) in your Administration / Commercial Court, who have been assigned the task as Trustees/Executor [Incorporated Public Servants] of the SURNAME CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST.
Pursuant to Section 15AA bail not to be granted under any circumstances until such time as pursuant to Section 72ii of the Commonwealth Constitution you be placed before the Governor General &: Two Houses of Parliament where you will have your opportunity to explain your Misbehaving in the Court.
Misrepresenting a living man or woman as a fictional “person” causing unwitting
“joinder” is the crime of “personage”, and it is perpetuated by “barratry”,
the crime of bringing false claims in court.
The term “barratry”, appropriately, comes from the “Bar Association”. (Attempted “joinder” by any legal “person” actor is a 'Crime involving deceit', Under the Common Law Jurisdiction (Law of the Land), both parties must enter into every contract knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally, or the contract is unenforceable and void.
Be aware I am a subject of the Crown / Commonwealth whose coat of arms is the Lion and Unicorn, and as such I am protected by the laws of the Crown against any attempts to usurp my rights or pillage my property. I am not a member of the Australian Government Corporation whose trade mark is the Kangaroo and Emu.
This Affidavit of Fact is from, a Live Wo/Man known as fname-mname, sname. I have Beneficial use of the SURNAME CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST who you have Summoned to Court. The name FIRST MIDDLE SURNAME is registered to the Registrar on the Birth Certificate. The Registrar has legal title therefore ownership of the name. I am only the Beneficial user or Beneficiary. You will at all times respectfully acknowledge and protect granted to all Live Men and Women their Australian Constitution 1900UK & 1901, Common Law and Human Rights.
DO NOT FAIL to recognise We are NOT Slave / Property and have NO Contract with a man and/or woman who is acting for any service corporation. All our interactions are by voluntary consent.
I, a Commonwealth National / Sovereign / Live Wo/Man, in body-mind-spirit, authorised beneficiary for the artificial person First Middle SURNAME and in all its CAPITAL variants, non-adverse, non-belligerent, non-combatant, secured creditor and of sound mind with power-of-attorney, have examined your Infringement Notice issued by: Village Idiot and Court Summons issued by: Ben Cheating, and hereby Conditionally Accept said claim upon Verification with Material Evidence.
Copyright of Name - $10,000,000 Fee Schedule
I, am the Naked owner through Usufruct to the Legal Name. Therefore I do not Lawfully own them, but I Lawfully have the right to use them. Refer to attached Notice of Copyright and accompanied Schedule Fee. Unauthorised use of copyright is Ten Million Dollars Australian (AU$10,000,000.00).
* Fees will be invoiced to all unauthorised users Refer to Copyright Certificate registration number: 42820210913545MRS, Copyright claimant: fname-mname, sname attached.
* Exemption Granted: if your response means this matter is now legally/lawfully closed and properly settled before the Court Date, consent is only granted to reprint Name, SNAME in any variation to inform as such... We withdraw the charges.
I, fname-mname, sname, holder in Right of the office of Beneficiary, for the SURNAME CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST, hereby appoint Ben Cheating in his/her public capacity to the office of Executor for said trust to make full settlement and closure of the account.
* Refer: UCC FINANCING STATEMENT, Filed 05/11/2022, Time 12.37 AM, Number 2022-131-5513-7
fname-mname, sname, a Wo/Man, do not consent to be surety for this Statutory proceedings. I Do not consent to contract, Joinder, Implied, stated and waiver all benefits on offer at all times, Implied or stated by all Incorporated Government Employees, in order to properly validate the alleged presumptions/claim/charge(s), made by Ben Cheating lodged with the Court Clerk/Registrar against the SURNAME CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST.
We require the following presentment of your material evidence supporting the Court Summons:
VERIFY FIRST; Provide proof of claim for something that you are alleging, I, a Living Man, am obligated to obey under your authority and jurisdiction of Statutes, what I can not do?
VERIFY SECOND; Provide a Certified Copy of fname-mname, sname, DEATH CERTIFICATE?
Failure to produce material evidence in this matter, Your Claim is null & void and must be dismissed with great prejudice, less you officers of the court be collaterally attacked and estopped, and charged with multiple counts of constructive and conversionary fraud!
In your “Legalise Terms” these frauds are considered “MURDER!”.
1. Prove with Material Evidence both Lawfully and Legally, fname-mname a Wo/Man is the decadent and Legal Fiction, First-Middle SURNAME and all other Capital Name Variants.
2. Presentment of Material Evidence that a valid contract signed by both parties, between Fname- Mname, and a Woman or Man employed by the NSW GOVERNMENT CORPORATION, confirming bilateral consent under full disclose under Rule of Law and Colour of Law.
3. Prove both Lawfully and Legally that First-Middle, a Common Law protected free Wo/Man, is obligated to serve as a Slave to the ABN Corporate Governments; Australian Government and State Government to do at their whim without question, under duress and deceptive non full disclosure? Also;
4. Which Specific Act Statute does First-Middle have an obligation to obey / operating under, if no contract between the aforementioned parties exists;
5. Prove that a Commonwealth Referendum was made whereby we the Commonwealth Sovereigns agreed to replace the Commonwealth Constitution of Australia Act 1901 with the Australia Act 1986 giving it Legal Authority for all Corporate Government Employees including Law Enforcement and Court Staff to have authority over we the unconsenting Wo/Man.
6. Provide material evidence / supporting documents, the Statutes / Laws claimed and relied on by the prosecution has Royal/Crown Assent.
* Case Law Refer: 51841/15 Michael-Grant Nibbs V. Western Prosecutions Services 2015: Magistrate Mckee.
* (All Acts after the Australia ACT 1986 are only purported Acts with purported enactments)
* (All Acts after the 1966 have no Queen Seal, after 1973 have no Royal Crown Assent.)
“FAILURE to DIFFERENTIATE between a STATUTE and Law
is GROSS NEGLIGENCE which is equivalent to FRAUD”
7. Prove Ben Cheating and Village Idiot, employee(s) of the INCORPORATED NSW POLICE FORCE, who was the man that Detained/Arrested We the living Wo/Man, also those associated with the initial detainment/arrest/imprisonment and are all acting in the role under Oath as a Commonwealth Public Officer in their Peace Officer/Policy Officer/Law Enforcement Capacity, have proof of claim as to their legal/lawful jurisdiction i.e. a Royal Crown Warrant/Grant/Certificate, Oath of Allegiance/Affirmation under the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Acts 1900UK & 1901, failing which they all will become liable for any damages we suffer, Indictable Offences against the Commonwealth – Crimes Act 1914.
8. Ben Cheating (Prosecutor/Executor) and Village Idiot (Arresting Officer) has levelled a criminal charge with the Court Clerk/Registrar against the SURNAME CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST. We demand your Court Bond and/ or Indemnity Insurance Bond be presented, so We can see who will indemnify us if we are harmed and damaged.
Vicarious Liability is that the employee is personally liable, not acting on behalf of the employer if he/she is acting beyond the scope / limitations of their employment standards of professional conduct and ethics policy. When a Legal Public Servant is not doing their job - legal duty and not have a lawful excuse for not doing it, is therefore complicit at our expense facilitating enrichment of the Courts unlawfully. Crimes Act 1914
9. Commonwealth Constitution 1901 Section 72, Appointment and Dismissal of Court Judicial...
Provide with Material Evidence, Your Public Servants (Staff) / Corporate Government Employees acting in the role of Court Administration/Judicial/Law Enforcement Capacity have evidence as to their legal and lawful jurisdiction/authority as my Commonwealth Public Servants, failing which you all will become liable for any harm and damage We may suffer.
A judgement was handed down by a New South Wales Judge, not just a Magistrate, stating that a challenge to the court asking if a city council officer who issued a parking ticket could prove that he was a lawfully appointed Crown Public Officer. As he could not, the case was dismissed. Legal Precedent Reference: IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES CRIMINAL JURISDICTION, District Court Parramatta, Case Number: 2013/00041691
10. Present physical evidence / witness / claimant, that is a man and or woman (Victim), has suffered LOSS, DAMAGE or HARM for the alleged charges being filed.
“NO Victim, NO Property Damage = NO CRIME = NO Case to be heard.”
This Affidavit Stands and can only be challenged by way of another Affidavit with personal knowledge and Under the Penalty of Perjury as it being true and correct.
Failure to substantiate / rebut this Affidavit within fourteen days (14) days of recorded delivery of this Notice, shall constitute legal/lawful Accord and Satisfaction given to settle and close all said alleged action/claims. This Notice also constitutes an automatic default, of an Irrevocable Estoppel by Acquiescence. It is important to understand that No Rebuttal means this matter is now legally/lawfully
closed and properly settled.
In that event, we reserve the right to charge damages against Ben Cheating and Village Idiot in their private capacity, under their full commercial liability, including their Employer(s), for any unverified claims presented thereafter regarding this matter.
REMINDER: Copyright of Name Fee Schedule will be actioned for Invoicing.
We look forward to reviewing your evidence, or confirmation of settlement of the account.
Court Cheat Sheet - Standing On Your Jurisdiction
When Trustee (Judge) calls out your name!
You goal is to read each of these paragraphs in to the record.
The Killer Collapse of a court hearing: Where is my jury? Is there a Jury attending? If answer is NO...
Declare: On the court of record this is a Mis-trial and you can call me to return when one has been organised. Thank you / have a nice day.
Then walk out like they are nothing.
I am here in regards to that matter as the authorized representative by special appearance to settle the matter. Judge, your honour, since you are acting as trustee what more information do you need from me to settle this matter. Can you see that I have posted a bond for discharge.
CIVIL CHARGE: You have to accept for value the case to bring it into the private side. “I accept the case for value and return it for value”, now you have removed yourself from the status of chattel.
CRIME CHARGE: Every crime has a penal / penalty Offence, some attached they're collecting a debt. You will go into your default judgment because you don't know about it. Is there an injured party, no than seeya/goodbye.
If no BOND and/all else fails I make it very clear and understood for the court of record, I am, Fname-Mname, a Commonwealth Sovereign, Australian National. I am Here only to find out who will indemnify me for harm and damage caused by this courts INTENT, fraudulent attempt to enrich our employer and yourselves refusing to acknowledge my Lawful position as the Beneficiary for the Artificial Person, Fname Mname, SNAME in CAPITALS summoned here today.
If you seek the Flesh Blood and Soul Living man to act as Surety in this matter, that would be YOU Trustee (point at Judge) assigned by the Court Clerk to administer the Constructive CQV Trust with the Executor (point at prosecutor) who should have his cheque book on hand to pay his Complainant and all court costs.
Including Financial Compensation for myself being the Claimant, not the defendant.
Do you Understand Trustee? (point at judge).
If you presume I am the Summoned Entity, prove it by presenting my Death Certificate?
Say this every time they speak to you.
I do not Consent, I do not accept your offer?
FAILURE to DIFFERENTIATE between a STATUTE and Law
is GROSS NEGLIGENCE which is equivalent to FRAUD
I will hold you for contempt of Justice and Offenses against the Commonwealth.
Refer: FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA – Rushton v Kaney [AKA Dickerson] & Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation & Ors (No 3) [2021] FCA 358 ~ inferior judgment fraudulently obtained.
COURTS ACT 1400 - There can be NO COURT COSTS ASSOCIATED with any court the body corporate holds against you. Courts Act 1400 – all Commonwealth Sovereigns have FREE COURT ACCESS. To deny this, all body corporate employees will be sued in their private capacity under their commercial liability along with their employer for Indictable Offenses against the Commonwealth… Do you understand Trustee (point at judge).
I, Fname-Mname, am the Commonwealth - JUDICIARY ACT 1903 – SECT 67A, Crimes Act 1914 – s23 Civil rights not effected,
This court is clearly not practicing Common Law – JUDICIARY ACT 1903 – SECT 80
No Jury Present and many other misconduct issues are presented in this Court - not lawful under the Australian Constitution 1901 CHAPTER 3.
It is therefore evident that you are all NOT Commonwealth Officers - Misrepresenting a living man or woman as a fictional “person” causing unwitting “joinder” is the crime of “personage”, and it is perpetuated by “barratry”, the crime of bringing false claims. False Claims meaning… Fraud, Identity Theft, Trespass to name a few. - Crimes Act 1901 (Cth)
s3 Definitions s5 Aiders & abettors
s42 Conspiracy to defeat justice s41 Conspiracy to bring false accusation
s39 Destroying evidence s36 Fabricating evidence
s35 Giving false testimony, s32 Judicial corruption,
s28 Interfering with political liberty,
Attempting to pervert justice – Crimes Act 1914
s43 Personating public officers s75, Falsification of record by officers
s72 Falsification of record by officers s73 Official corruption
Notice To Obey The Rule Of Law
Constitution and Common Law: Provides That It Is A Crime To Violate The Rights Of A Commonwealth Sovereign Under The Colour-of-law.
Attempting To Cause: Being A Corporate Government, Corporate Public Servant, Employee Or Other Entity (Statutory), To Do Something, By Telling That Living Being (Commonwealth) That Such Action Is Required By Law When It Is Not Required By Law, Is A Crime.
Under the Common Law Jurisdiction: (Law of the Land), both parties must enter into every contract knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally, or the contract is unenforceable and void.
The High Court Of Australia Ruled that a Statutory body (THATS YOU), an Incorporated Entity that is not a court, has no judicial authority and can not act judicially. Examples being the NSW Police Force, Revenue NSW, ATO, Council, Local Courts etc can not impose any judgement or penalty of fines or costs of any kind which only can be done by a competent court under Chapter 3 Australian Constitution 1901 (Cth).
You are ALL private corporations conducting business/commerce (a statutory). So the canceling of car licenses, registration, Property theft i.e. automobile, at the direction of any NSW Services Corporation is unlawful. So says the Rules of the High Court. Ref: R v Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers.
Commonwealth Constitution 1900UK & 1901
The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 is the single most important piece of legislation in this country and dictates precisely what the State and Federal governments can and cannot lawfully do.
The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 has 9 parts and the ninth part contains the Commonwealth Constitution. However, there are some important parts to take note of before you get to part 9.
The first of those is the preamble, which states that it is “We, The People” that have the power to bring the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act into being. We are the highest law in the land.
The second covers clause 5, which states that the Act “shall be binding on the courts, judges, and the people of every State and of every part of the Commonwealth...” So, if any Magistrate or Judge presumes “the Constitution doesn’t apply”, Indictable Offences against the Commonwealth, Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) apply.
Some of the most important sections that will be relevant to you would be the following:
Section 72 – which deals with the appointment and dismissal of judicial officers. All Judges must comply, so must police or anyone acting in a role of judicial/enforcement capacity.
Ask for a copy of their certificate and/or oath of office.
Section 92 – dictates that intercourse amongst the states shall be absolutely free. Remember this the next time some private corporation tries to charge you a “toll” for using “their” road.
Section 108 – which dictates that any colony that becomes a State under the Constitution – which is all of them – is subject to the Constitution.
Section 109 – this goes on to state that, where there is a conflict between a State law and a Commonwealth law, then the latter shall prevail. Remember this next time someone tries to fine you based on a speed detection device that doesn’t comply with Section 10 of the National Measurement Act - which is, of course, a Commonwealth Act.
Section 115 – which details the fact that a State shall not make ANYTHING other than gold or silver coin legal tender in payment of a debt. Remember this any time you have any State debt to “pay” that is over $20 – see Sections 9, 11, 16 & 22 of the Currency Act 1965 for further details.
Section 117 – which states that a person cannot be subjected to any discrimination because of a law that exists in one State but not another. Keep this in mind if you are ever charged for an offence in one state that is not an offence in another – ie having a radar detector in a State other than WA, or being a “bikie” in QLD.
Section 118 – which states that full faith and credit will be to the laws, acts and public records, and the judicial proceedings of every State. Remember this when someone tries to tell you, for example, that the WA Fisheries case doesn’t apply in your State, or when the police publicly admit that speed cameras have been proven to be faulty!
Fines and Infringements, and the law
Under Section 8, sub-section 12 of the Imperial Acts Application Act dictates that “All promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void. Quite simply, that means that, until you have been convicted of something by a court of competent jurisdiction, ALL fines are illegal.
That means speeding fines, parking fines, red light camera fines, infringement notices, explanation notices, failure to vote fine, failure to register dog fines and ANY other type of fine you can name, are ALL completely illegal!
Yes, the Imperial Acts Application Act is an Act of the Parliament of Victoria but if you go to Sections 116 and 117, you will see that ALL states have to give full force and effect to the Victorian Act, and you cannot be punished or penalised because you live in another State that does not have that same Act, has repealed it, or has changed it in some way.
And, furthermore, even if there was no such thing as an Imperial Acts Application Act, the Imperial Acts would still apply anyway because, again, as is stipulated in the Commonwealth Constitution, all the laws that applied in England at Federation still apply today, because only the UK Parliament can repeal them.
“The only legal TENDER (money) to be exchanged is gold or silver coins. The highest valued TENDER is the $2 gold coin and therefore must not exceed by value more than 10 TIMES it’s value. Reinstate my Drivers License immediately and send me a bill of $20 according to our Constitution dated 1900 & 1901”.
Affidavit Of Fact NOT REBUTTED
The Executor / Prosecutor Failure to substantiate / rebut the Affidavit Of Fact which constituted a legal/lawful Accord and Satisfaction settling his case and close all said alleged action/claims.
This Accord & Satisfaction has also constituted an automatic default, of an Irrevocable Estoppel by Acquiescence. It is important to understand that No Rebuttal Reply means this matter is now legally/lawfully closed and properly settled.
The Terms & Conditions: The Affidavit of Fact stands and could only be challenged by way of an Affidavit with personal knowledge and Under the Penalty of Perjury as it being true and correct. (Crimes Act 1914 – Perjury).
POINT FINGER AT THEM... Any further action by You Trustee (Judge) and your Executor, joint Trust Administrator here... or by any of your Policy Officers, Subordinates, threats to enforce your fraudulent claim, will constitute a Claim for Damages process, which holds you personally accountable in your Private Capacity, under your Commercial Liability governed by the Crimes Act 1914 and you will all be held accountable for your poor judgement in ERROR IN FACT and ERROR IN LAW and crimes against the commonwealth.
You are advised to Cease and Desist with your demand and to seek personal legal counsel if you do not understand the commonwealth law.
Invoice - Non-Negotiable
By AUSTRALIA POST - Express Post - Article ID: 123456789
Fname-Middle, sname
as Beneficiary/Executor for Artificial Person,
Fname Mname SNAME
Care of 30 Fake Crescent
Yourtown NSW [2753]
Australian Nation
Non-Commercial
Attention to the following
Trustees/Administrator(s) [Incorporated Public Servant(s)]
Dumb Arse, in his private capacity
[SENIOR CONSTABLE, #40980
ST. GEORGE HIGHWAY PATROL
RIVERWOOD POLICE STATION]
193 Belmore Road
Riverwood NSW 2210
Date: 15th January 2023
Infringement Notice Number(s); xxxxxxxxxxxxx, xxxxxxxxxxxxx & xxxxxxxxxxxx
Non Rebuttal Response of the Conditional Acceptance Dated: 5th December 2020 has constituted an automatic default, of an Irrevocable Estoppel by Acquiescence. It is important to understand, this matter is now legally/lawfully closed and properly settled from the twenty eight (28) days after receiving the Conditional Acceptance, by AUSTRALIA POST - Express Post - Article ID: TPM 1234 5678 9000 0000
It is clearly stated in the Terms & Conditions: If you don’t mail me a corrected presentment within 28 days, you are agreeing that I owe you NOTHING.
You have Dishonoured the Conditional Acceptance Agreement, Terms and Conditions by your continued Intent / Actions; You did NOT mail me a corrected presentment, you have not Rebutted the Conditional Acceptance before the twenty eight (28) expiry, you have agreed that We owe you NOTHING, by instructing Revenue NSW to proceed with collections sending a reminder notice and refusing to Cease and Desist with your fraudulent claims with the sole intent to enrich your employer, NSW Government Corporation through Revenue NSW, which are both corporate entities who are body corporate(s), NOT Commonwealth of Australia Entities under the Commonwealth Constitution Act 1900UK & 1901 and Crimes Act 1914.
* Public Governance, Performance and Accountability Act 2013. Chapter 2, Division 2, s10, s11, & s12
Commonwealth Consolidated Acts – CRIMES ACT 1914 – SECT 4B
Pecuniary penalties--natural persons and bodies corporate
(1) A provision of a law of the Commonwealth relating to indictable offences or summary offences shall, unless the contrary intention appears, be deemed to refer to bodies corporate as well as to natural persons.
(2) Where a natural person is convicted of an offence against a law of the Commonwealth punishable by imprisonment only, the court may, if the contrary intention does not appear and the court thinks it appropriate in all the circumstances of the case, impose, instead of, or in addition to, a penalty of imprisonment, a pecuniary penalty not exceeding the number of penalty units calculated using the formula: Term of Imprisonment x 5
CRIMES ACT 1914
An Act relating to Offences against the Commonwealth. [Assented to 29th October, 1914.]
BE it enacted by the King’s Most Excellent Majesty, the Senate,, and the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Australia, as follows:—
Definitions.
3. In this Act, unless the contrary intention appears—
“Commonwealth officer” means any person holding office under the Commonwealth, and includes any person permanently or temporarily employed in the Public Service of the Commonwealth, or in or in connexion with the Naval or Military Forces of the Commonwealth, or in the service of any public authority under the Commonwealth and includes an officer of the Commonwealth Bank;
“Constable” includes any member of the police force of the Commonwealth or of a State or of a Territory being part of the Commonwealth;
“Have in possession” includes having under control in any place whatever, whether for the use or benefit of the person of whom the term is used or of another person, and although another person has the actual possession or custody of the thing in question;
“Property” includes money and every thing, animate or inanimate, capable of being the subject of ownership;
“Territory” means a Territory of, or under the control of, the Commonwealth.
Application of common law.
4. The principles of the common law with respect to criminal liability shall, subject to this Act, apply in relation to offences against this Act.
Institution of proceedings in respect of offences
13. Unless the contrary intention appears in the Act or regulation creating the offence, any person may;
(a) institute proceedings for the commitment for trial of any person in respect of any indictable offence against the law of the Commonwealth; or
(b) institute proceedings for the summary conviction of any person in respect of any offence against the law of the Commonwealth punishable on summary conviction.
We, Fname Mname, sname, a man, aggrieved by your breach of the law, now issue a Civil Invoice, for my Constitutional, Common Law, Inalienable and Unalienable Rights being disrespected, abused, ignored, harmed, damaged and your overreach of jurisdiction and authority, dishonourable performance, contrary to your Limited Professional Conduct and Ethics Policy, acting in a Public Servant Office, in your private capacity under your commercial liability, including your Corporate Employer(s), the NSW Police Force, NSW Government and Revenue NSW, complicit in those same Indictable Offences.
So, Dumb Arse, in your private capacity, under your commercial liability, you are liable to the said Fname Mname, sname, and the Commonwealth Crown for the sum of $264,000 accrued daily while the offence continued by S 4K Crimes Act 1914, whether you like it or not.
Reference: Private Settlement Affidavit AFFREF
The High Court Of Australia Ruled that a Statutory body (THATS YOU, an Incorporated Entity) that is not a court, has no judicial authority and can not act judicially. Examples being the NSW Police Force, Revenue NSW, ATO, Council, Local Courts etc can not impose any judgement or penalty of fines or costs of any kind which only can be done by a competent court under Chapter 3 Australian Constitution 1901 (Cth).
You are ALL private corporations conducting business/commerce (a statutory). So the cancelling of car licenses, registration, Property theft i.e. automobile, at the direction of any NSW Services Corporation is unlawful. So says the Rules of the High Court. Ref: R v Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers.
To the Court Clerk who created the Constructive CQV Trust, assigning the Trustee/Judge/Magistrate and the Executor/Prosecutior.
You have attempted within the meaning of S.14 Crimes Act 1914 to pervert the course of justice in respect of the judicial power of the commonwealth, and being bound by S.43 of the Crimes Act 1914, by S.5 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 you have incurred the liquidated penalty of $00000.00 for attempting to avoid the provision of S.80 of the Constitution. $0,000,000
Also Refer: JUDICIARY ACT 1903 – SECT 80 & JUDICIARY ACT 1903 – SECT 67A
Crimes Act 1914
s72. Falsification of books or record by officers. Cf. ib. ss. 441. 442. $115,500
s74 False returns or certificates by officers. Cf. ib. S 91. $33,000
s75 Personating public officers. Cf. ib. s. 97. $33,000
s86 Conspiracy. Cf. Qd. C. C., ss. 541–543. $49,500
s87 False certificates. Cf. ib. s. 94. $33,000
TOTAL: $264,000
NOTE: Indictable Offences against the Commonwealth that you have committed, are not limited to the list mentioned above. Its at the discretion of the plaintiff Fname-Middle, sname, a Commonwealth Subject, Free, Living Man to seek further unresolved claim using more evidential material at his / her disposal.
* Revenue NSW and NSW Government Corporations, your employer, will be Invoiced separately.
* Please make bank cheque payment in the name of Plaintiff within TWENTY EIGHT (28) days to avoid interest and further penalties.
Signed By:
fname-mname, sname
Only in capacity as Beneficiary of the original De Jure
Jurisdiction as agent for FNAME MNAME SNAME
(and any and all uppercase derivations and variations in the
spelling and or format of said names, including but not limited to,
prefixes, suffixes, titles, appendages and the like).
All Rights Reserved, No Loss or Liability

Notice to challenge presumptions of the courts jurisdiction
Your own letter heads and footers are required. Not legal advice*
Dear Registrar,
I have elected for a Court Hearing. I have matters listed for mention before you on the ………………….... The matters before you raise the issue of Commonwealth jurisdiction which may well be outside the jurisdiction of a Local Court as presently constituted.
While we are dual citizens being subjects of the King of the Constitution the status of a subject resident temporarily in a State and lawfully exercising his or her Political Freedom under S 80.3 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) is a question of fact, that under the International Covenant on civil and political rights Articles 9 and 14 ought to be determined promptly.
In 2001 those Articles were incorporated into S 268:12 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) as a serious indictable offense by the Parliament of the Commonwealth. A breach of that carries a Personal liability of $214,000 to the Prosecutor, and to the body Corporate, namely the State of New South Wales, State of Victoria, State of Queensland as the case may be.
The question the prosecutors against me need to have determined is are they exempt from the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 and Constitution, or subject to it and consequently if not, my actions they object to are lawfully conducted. I am by S 13 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) entitled, by S 4B Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) to put a liquidated value on the fines being attempted to be enforced against me.
On every occasion when we ask that you strictly prove that the King that underpins the Crown in the States is legitimate, to comply with the High Court decision in 2006.
That decision, Forge v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2006] HCA 44 materially reinforces the Constitution, and cites as good law the Supreme Court Act of 1867, (Q) which incorporates the ‘Common Law’ as in force in 1900, into the Laws of the Commonwealth. From that Act the feigned issue, a mechanism to allow any common person to judicially review in front of a jury any act, or decree issued by any public official, became part of the received law.
All demonstrations against arbitrary lock down, are caught by S 80.3. Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) which materially reads as follows. 80.3 Defence for acts done in good faith
(1) Subdivisions B and C, and sections 83.1 and 83.4, do not apply to a person who:
(a) tries in good faith to show that any of the following persons are mistaken in any of his or her counsels, policies or actions:
(i) the Sovereign;
(ii) the Governor-General;
(iii) the Governor of a State;
(iv) the Administrator of a Territory.
(v) an adviser of any of the above;
(vi) a person responsible for the government of another country; or
(b) points out in good faith errors or defects in the following, with a view to reforming those errors or defects
(i) the Government of the Commonwealth, a State or a Territory;
(ii) the Constitution;
(iii) legislation of the Commonwealth, a State, a Territory or another country;
(iv) the administration of justice of or in the Commonwealth, a State, a Territory or another country; or
(c) urges in good faith another person to attempt to lawfully procure a change to any matter established by law, policy or practice in the Commonwealth, a State, a Territory or another country; or
(d) points out in good faith any matters that are producing, or have a tendency to produce, feelings of ill-will or hostility between different groups, in order to bring about the removal of those matters; or
(e) does anything in good faith in connection with an industrial dispute or an industrial matter; or
(f) publishes in good faith a report or commentary about a matter of public interest.
Good Faith is a question for a jury to determine on indictment and guaranteed by S 79 and 80 Constitution.
If it can be alleged that S 42, 43 and 44 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) are good law, then the failure of the Federal Court of Australia to allow any person to file an application under S 13 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) there under the Federal Court (Criminal Practice) Rules 2016 on the whim of a Registrar or Judge, is a crime against humanity, under S 268:12 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) and a crime against the administration of justice under s 43 and 44 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth). The Penalty by law, for a breach of S 268:12 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) is $214,000 for an individual, and $1071,000 for a body corporate which a State or Australian Government is.
(S 64 Judiciary Act 1903) A Breach of S 43 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) carries a penalty of $126,000 and $630,000 for a corporation.
I am a living man/woman, that is my only capacity in this matter, reserving all my rights waiving none, including my Right Not to Contract, is INVIOLABLE and UNLIMITED. At all times you are to presume I am Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Any presentment for demand of payment prior to a court verdict of guilty, is a criminal offense and the claimant will be held accountable for harm and damage caused in their private capacity.

JESSE NEIMUS
Associate Director

DREW CARLYLE
Small Business Consultant

TAYLOR QUILL
Senior Advisor

How to write your own statement of claims
Not legal advice
This explains what a Statement of Claim is and how you complete one.
Small-claims courts have limited jurisdiction to hear civil cases between private litigants. Courts authorized to try small claims may also have other judicial functions, and go by different names in different jurisdictions. For example, it may be known as a county or magistrate's court.
The jurisdiction of small-claims courts typically encompasses private disputes that do not involve large amounts of money. The routine collection of small debts forms a large portion of the cases brought to small-claims courts, as well as evictions and other disputes between landlords and tenants, unless the jurisdiction is already covered by a tenancy board.
A small-claims court generally has a maximum monetary limit to the amount of judgments it can award, often in the thousands of dollars/pounds. By suing in a small-claims court, the plaintiff typically waives any right to claim more than the court can award. The plaintiff may or may not be allowed to reduce a claim to fit the requirements of this venue. 'Court shopping'—where a plaintiff reduces the damage claim amount to have a trial in a court that otherwise does not have jurisdiction—is strictly forbidden in some states[vague]. For example, if a plaintiff asserts damages of $30,000 in hopes of winning an award of $25,000 in small-claims court, the court dismisses the case because the court does not have jurisdiction to hear cases in which asserted damages exceed the court's maximum amount.
Thus, even if the plaintiff is willing to accept less than the full amount, the case cannot be brought to small-claims court. To bring the case to small-claims court, the plaintiff must prove that actual damages are within the court's jurisdiction. In some jurisdictions, a party who loses in a small-claims court is entitled to a trial de novo in a court of more general jurisdiction and with more formal procedures.
The rules of civil procedure, and sometimes of evidence, are typically altered and simplified to make the procedures economical. A usual guiding principle in these courts is that individuals ought to be able to conduct their own cases and represent themselves without a lawyer. Rules are relaxed but still apply to some degree. In some jurisdictions, corporations must still be represented by a lawyer in small-claims court. Expensive court procedures such as interrogatories and depositions are usually not allowed in small-claims court, and practically all matters filed in small-claims court are set for trial. Under some court rules, should the defendant not show up at trial and not have requested a postponement, a default judgment may be entered in favour of the plaintiff.
Trial by jury is seldom or never conducted in small-claims courts; it is typically excluded by the statute establishing the court. Similarly, equitable remedies such as injunctions, including protective orders, are seldom available from small-claims courts.
Separate family courts may exist to hear simple cases in family law. For reasons having more to do with history than with the sort of case typically heard by a small-claims court, most US states do not allow domestic relations disputes in small-claims court.
Winning in small-claims court does not automatically ensure payment in recompense of a plaintiff's damages. This may be relatively easy, in the case of a dispute against an insured party, or extremely difficult, in the case of an uncooperative, transient, or indigent defendant. The judgment may be collected through wage garnishment and liens.
Most courts encourage parties with disputes to seek alternative dispute resolution, if possible, before filing suit. For example, the Superior Court of Australia provides guidelines for resolving disputes out of court. Both parties can agree on arbitration by a third party to settle their dispute outside of court, though while small-claims court judgments can still be appealed,[1] arbitration awards cannot.
What is a statement of claim?
A statement of claim is a document prepared by the plaintiff, that is, the person or company who is initiating the case in the court.
A statement of claim usually accompanies a writ or could be otherwise needed during the course of a proceeding.
The Statement of Claim states the nature and cause of the claim, and the relief or remedy sought in the proceeding.
How do I complete my Statement of Claim?
Using headings can assist the reader to understand your claim.
You should number each paragraph of your statement of claim.
This makes its simpler for you, the defendant and the judge to refer to a particular point.
Each paragraph should follow logically from the one before and be in chronological date order.
Write your statement of claim using simple everyday language.
What information should I include in my statement of claim?
- The Statement of claim should start by identifying the parties to the dispute and their relationship to each other.
- Include any relevant background facts.
- Explain how and in what way the defendant has wronged you according to law. This is the legal basis for your claim.
- State the essential facts which support the claim being made.
- End the statement of claim with clear statements of the orders that you want the Court to make.
What information should I leave out of my statement of claim?
Limit your statement of claim to things which are relevant to your case. Do not include evidence
- evidence is presented at the trial to prove the essential facts referred to in your Statement of Claim.
Leave out any detailed arguments about how the law applies to your case.
You may have an opportunity to make these legal arguments (called ‘submissions’) at the hearing of your case.
Put emotions about your dispute aside by not including your opinion or sharing what you think has happened.
Stick to the facts. Be aware… If you include inappropriate or irrelevant material in a statement of claim, the other party may apply to have that material struck out or removed. If the other party is successful in their application to have part or all of your claim struck out, the Court may order you to pay their legal costs in bringing that application.
Even if you have successfully applied for a fee waiver in the proceeding, these legal costs will still be payable.
I’ve finished writing my Statement of Claim, what do I do next?
You must file the document in to Magistrate Court who will notify you by email when your Statement of Claim has been accepted.
Please note, this does not mean that a judgment has been made in your favour.
Further steps are required before your case can be determined.
Download the sealed copy of the Statement of Claim from Local Court and serve the sealed copy on the defendant or defendants.
The Supreme Court publishes a range of Guides to assist Self-Represented Litigants work through all the steps involved in bringing a proceeding. These guides can be found in the ‘Representing Yourself’ section of the Court’s website.
NSW Local Court small claims (nsw.gov.au)
VIC Starting a civil matter | Magistrates Court of Victoria (mcv.vic.gov.au)
WA Civil Matters (magistratescourt.wa.gov.au)
SA Before making a claim - CAA (courts.sa.gov.au)
TAS Magistrates Court : Civil disputes
NT How to make a small claim | NT.GOV.AU
Australia[edit] Small claims court - Wikipedia
NOTE: Dispute amounts may change without notice. Check before using small claims court to ensure the $$$ value you claim doesnt exceed the states limit otherwise your claim goes to big boy Magistrate court.
Small claims are handled differently by each state and territory, with most relying on tribunals while others have a minor claims division of their respective magistrates court:[5]
-
Australian Capital Territory: ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal has jurisdiction over civil disputes involving amounts up to $25,000[6]
-
New South Wales: The Small Claims Division of the Local Court of New South Wales hears civil claims up to $20,000, while the General Division hears civil disputes between $20,000 and $100,000 in value.[7]
-
Northern Territory: Northern Territory Civil and Administrative Tribunal has jurisdiction over small claims, which involve amounts up to $25,000[8]
-
Queensland: Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal deals with minor civil disputes, which involve amounts up to $25,000[9]
-
South Australia: Magistrates Court of South Australia hears a minor claim, which is up to $25,000 in value[10]
-
Western Australia: Magistrates Court of Western Australia hears a minor case, which involves a claim up to $10,000[11]
Regards
Telegram Live In Private (LIP)
.png)